Trial of the terrorist attack follows the “psychological” line

Category status:
April 22, 2016 17:48

Hearings of the terrorist attack case move along the “psychological” line, i.e. the prosecution shows that the explosion was due to the character of the accused. The authorities explicitly have not used the hearings to strengthen their position.

The trial of the terrorist attack in the Minsk metro on 11 April 2011 continues in Minsk with interrogation of the accused and witnesses, as well as examination of materials of the case.

Comment

Hearings of the terrorist attack case move along the “psychological” line, i.e. the prosecution shows that the explosion was due to the character of the accused. The authorities explicitly have not used the hearings to strengthen their position.

The hearing, which takes place in the Minsk Palace of Justice, follows the lead of the preliminary investigation, i.e. that the main motive of the defendant, accused of committing the explosion, was personal, that he was not acting in the interests of political or religious groups. This version had been voiced immediately after the explosion by the Belarusian KGB and became the main lead.

When the trial started, the defendant Dmitry Konovalov confessed of committing two bombings: in Minsk in 2008 during the Independence Day celebrations and in the Minsk Metro on 11 April 2011. He refused to testify against himself. The other defendant, Kovalev, changed his previous statements several times, referring to the pressure, allegedly put on him. Neither of the defendants denies his guilt.

At least at this stage of the trial, there has not been a single fact that could be interpreted as if there was a customer of the attack or government could be involved.

Regardless of some minor inconsistencies in the testimony of witnesses, for example, concerning the detention of suspects, the main lead of the investigation is sufficiently plausible. At least at this stage of the trial, there has not been a single fact that could be interpreted as if there was a customer of the attack or government could be involved.

Contrary to our predictions, the authorities have not used the trial to strengthen their position in the society or to put pressure on the political opponents. However, last week the draft amendments to the Law “On State Security Agencies” have been published, envisaging expansion of powers of the KGB and other intelligence agencies.

It is likely that the MPs will be forced to vote for these amendments as part of the counter-terrorism measures. So far neither the government, nor the opposition is prepared to use the ongoing trial to their advantage, therefore the trial progresses quite objectively.

The September opinion poll in Belarus showed a significant decrease in trust to the law enforcement agencies: by about 8% as compared with December 2010. The least of all citizens trust the Interior Ministry and the KGB: 35.3% and 33.8% respectively.

On the one hand, the openness and objectivity of the hearings during which the court revealed a number of serious shortcomings by the security agencies, could have a negative effect: the distrust to the authorities could increase. The September opinion poll in Belarus showed a significant decrease in trust to the law enforcement agencies: by about 8% as compared with December 2010. The least of all citizens trust the Interior Ministry and the KGB: 35.3% and 33.8% respectively.

On the other hand, the openness of the hearing may produce the opposite effect, i.e. the society will believe the investigation and the prosecution. So far, it seems that the authorities do not have a clear plan how to use this process for their benefit.


Similar articles

President ensures continuity of state administration with young middle-level personnel
October 02, 2017 12:08
Image: BRSM.BY

President Lukashenka continues to rotate staff and rejuvenate heads of departments and universities following new appointments in regional administrations. Apparently, new Information Minister Karliukevich could somewhat relax the state policy towards the independent media and introduce technological solutions for retaining control over Belarus’ information space. New rectors could strengthen the trend for soft Belarusization in the regions and tighten the disciplinary and ideological control over the student movement in the capital.

President Lukashenka has appointed new ministers of culture and information, the new rector of the Belarusian State University and heads of three universities, assistants in the Minsk and Vitebsk regions.

The new Information Minister Karliukevich is likely to avoid controversial initiatives similar to those former Minister Ananich was famous for, however, certainly within his capacities. Nevertheless, the appointment of Belarusian-speaking writer Karliukevich could be regarded as the state’s cautious attempt to relax environment in the media field and ensure the sovereignty of national media.

The Belarusian leadership has consolidated the trend for mild Belarusization by appointing a young historian and a ‘reasonable nationalist’, Duk as the rector at the Kuleshov State University in Mogilev. Meanwhile, while choosing the head of the Belarusian State University, the president apparently had in mind the strengthening of the ideological loyalty among the teaching staff and students at the main university in order to keep the youth movement at bay. Previously, Korol was the rector of the Kupala State University in Grodno, where he held purges among the disloyal teaching staff.

The trend for the renewal of mid-ranking executives and their rejuvenation has confirmed. The age of the Culture Minister and three new rectors varies from 39 to 44 years old.

Recent trends