Trial of the terrorist attack follows the “psychological” line

April 22, 2016 17:48

Hearings of the terrorist attack case move along the “psychological” line, i.e. the prosecution shows that the explosion was due to the character of the accused. The authorities explicitly have not used the hearings to strengthen their position.

The trial of the terrorist attack in the Minsk metro on 11 April 2011 continues in Minsk with interrogation of the accused and witnesses, as well as examination of materials of the case.

Comment

Hearings of the terrorist attack case move along the “psychological” line, i.e. the prosecution shows that the explosion was due to the character of the accused. The authorities explicitly have not used the hearings to strengthen their position.

The hearing, which takes place in the Minsk Palace of Justice, follows the lead of the preliminary investigation, i.e. that the main motive of the defendant, accused of committing the explosion, was personal, that he was not acting in the interests of political or religious groups. This version had been voiced immediately after the explosion by the Belarusian KGB and became the main lead.

When the trial started, the defendant Dmitry Konovalov confessed of committing two bombings: in Minsk in 2008 during the Independence Day celebrations and in the Minsk Metro on 11 April 2011. He refused to testify against himself. The other defendant, Kovalev, changed his previous statements several times, referring to the pressure, allegedly put on him. Neither of the defendants denies his guilt.

At least at this stage of the trial, there has not been a single fact that could be interpreted as if there was a customer of the attack or government could be involved.

Regardless of some minor inconsistencies in the testimony of witnesses, for example, concerning the detention of suspects, the main lead of the investigation is sufficiently plausible. At least at this stage of the trial, there has not been a single fact that could be interpreted as if there was a customer of the attack or government could be involved.

Contrary to our predictions, the authorities have not used the trial to strengthen their position in the society or to put pressure on the political opponents. However, last week the draft amendments to the Law “On State Security Agencies” have been published, envisaging expansion of powers of the KGB and other intelligence agencies.

It is likely that the MPs will be forced to vote for these amendments as part of the counter-terrorism measures. So far neither the government, nor the opposition is prepared to use the ongoing trial to their advantage, therefore the trial progresses quite objectively.

The September opinion poll in Belarus showed a significant decrease in trust to the law enforcement agencies: by about 8% as compared with December 2010. The least of all citizens trust the Interior Ministry and the KGB: 35.3% and 33.8% respectively.

On the one hand, the openness and objectivity of the hearings during which the court revealed a number of serious shortcomings by the security agencies, could have a negative effect: the distrust to the authorities could increase. The September opinion poll in Belarus showed a significant decrease in trust to the law enforcement agencies: by about 8% as compared with December 2010. The least of all citizens trust the Interior Ministry and the KGB: 35.3% and 33.8% respectively.

On the other hand, the openness of the hearing may produce the opposite effect, i.e. the society will believe the investigation and the prosecution. So far, it seems that the authorities do not have a clear plan how to use this process for their benefit.


Similar articles

Minsk hopes Warsaw would revise decision regarding ban on electricity supply from Belarusian NPP
April 17, 2017 13:03

Last week, Belarusian Foreign Minister Makei participated in the foreign ministers’ meeting of the Eastern Partnership and Visegrad Group initiative hosted by Warsaw. The Belarusian FM emphasized Belarus' interest in cooperation in the transport sector, which could be due to Belarus’ desire to export electricity surplus after Belarus finished construction of the nuclear power plant in Ostrovets. Minsk expressed concerns about Warsaw’s stance on the Belarusian NPP, as it refused to buy electricity from Belarus and supported Vilnius’ protest on this issue. Following accusations by the Belarusian leadership and the state media against western states, including Poland, of training "nationalist militants", Minsk did not agree on the visit of the European Parliament deputies from Lithuania and Germany to Belarus and to the NPP construction site near Ostrovets in particular. In addition, the Belarusian authorities have stepped up efforts to enforce education in Russian in Polish-language schools in Grodno and Vaukavysk. Should a rift in Belarusian-Polish relations persist, the Belarusian authorities are likely to step up the pressure on the Polish-speaking minority in Belarus.