The regime stakes on populations and power elites support
On May 3rd, President Lukashenko ordered to arrest a number of employees of a private clinic Ecomedservice who were responsible for the death of a patient. The president also instructed the Ministry of Health to take over control and management of the clinic.
Belarusian President still regards popular support as a basis for his legitimacy. The upcoming presidential elections force Lukahsenko to sacrifice the interests of the nomenclature and private business in favor of the mass electorate and the law enforcement agencies.
The disproportionate reaction of the president, and especially the state media, to a tragic accident in the Ecomedservice clinic demonstrates that the country’s leadership decided to use it as an excuse for creating a precedent. As a result, the private medical care institution was subordinated to the Health Ministry, while the shortcomings of private healthcare were publicly demonstrated to the population.
Background of the case: on March 26, a 23-year-old Grodno resident was undergoing rhinoplasty in the clinic and died a month later without regaining consciousness. Reports say the reason why the patient fell into a coma could have been malfunctioning medical ventilation apparatus, used during the surgery, and alleged staff negligence. Criminal proceedings were initiated and five staff members of the clinic were detained.
The state media reacted to the case with harsh criticism of commercial healthcare. Sovetskaya Belorussiya, the Presidential Administration newspaper on April 26th published a very emotional article with the main conclusion, that “posh medical centres are OK to take the money without ensuring vitally important equipment functions”. The largest national state TV channels also actively covered the case in accusatory manner.
Finally, President Lukashenko’s open intervention in the case implies that he wants to have the maximum political benefit from the case. Firstly, he hopes to improve his popularity and secondly, to revise the current rules of interaction between government and business in Belarus.
Traditionally, President Lukashenko regards people’s support as the main source of his legitimacy so he is particularly concerned about increasing his popularity before the 2015 elections (according to independent polls, in March 2013 his electoral rating was 33.4%). It seems the Belarusian authorities consider strengthening of the state authority as the main source for improving Lukashenko’s authority in the country - even at the cost of Belarusian private business.
This is the main ‘nationalization’ style for a number of enterprises – in confectionery, leather and now in private healthcare. Using all these cases, the president wants to demonstrate that a strong state is a more efficient owner than a private business. At the same time the president sends unambiguous signals to business and nomenclature, that he is ready to sacrifice their interests for the sake of his own. The criminal case, initiated recently against some officials regarding illegal hunting confirms this theses (Lukashenko mentioned it twice during interviews).
President Lukashenko’s main supporters in his policies are the law enforcement agencies. That’s why since 2012 their number was growing (Investigative Committee, Unified Forensic Examination Service). There is a reason to believe that the observed strengthening of the state, as well as the merger of interests of President Lukashenko and the power elites has reached sufficient inertia for these processes to continue at least until the elections in 2015
During searches of social and "green" activists and anarchists, law enforcement has seized computers, mobile phones and publications. The authorities have also exerted additional pressure on supporters of unauthorized street protests and independent lawyers, who represented defendants in the White Legion case. The security services have stepped up the persecution of opponents before the street protests announced by the opposition. Apparently, the Belarusian authorities aspire that participants in street protests would reduce in number and that the low interest of the population to socio-political agenda before the local election campaign would retain.