Official Minsk not willing to back Kremlin in Ukraine economic blockade
Official Minsk is ready to resist the Kremlin from dragging Belarus into a trade war with Ukraine, if Belarus’ economic interests are at threat. If Moscow unilaterally imposes duties on imports from Ukraine, Belarus aspires to gain benefits from the common customs space with Russia by re-exporting Ukrainian goods to Russia. Meanwhile, the Belarusian government, without coordinating with Moscow, has introduced restrictions on importing some goods from Ukraine – as protective measures aiming to limit imports to Belarus.
Neither Belarus, nor Kazakhstan has supported Russia when the latter proposed to introduce duties on imports from Ukraine.
At the Eurasian Economic Union’s Board meeting in Sochi, Russia proposed Belarus and Kazakhstan to introduce jointly import duties on Ukrainian goods – due to Ukraine signing the economic chapter of the Association Agreement with the EU. However, official Minsk, upheld by Kazakhstan, spoke strongly against this decision. In addition, Belarus’ Foreign Ministry Spokesman Mironchik underscored that Ukraine signing the Association Agreement with the EU was “the sovereign right of a sovereign state”.
Until now, Belarus’ stance regarding the Russo-Ukrainian conflict was limited to statements about support for the new Kiev authorities and Ukraine’s territorial integrity. However, the Belarusian authorities have never dared to act independently regarding the most sensitive issues for Moscow. For example, Belarus supported Russia’s position during the UN vote on Ukraine’s territorial integrity and de facto upheld the annexation of Crimea by Russia. In addition, during the Russo-Ukrainian escalation, the Belarusian authorities allowed an increase in Russian military presence in Belarus.
The Belarusian leadership, however, is avoiding getting involved in the Kremlin’s economic pressure on Kiev, as it might destabilise the economic situation in Belarus and hinder the ongoing thaw in relations between Belarus and the EU. The USD 2 billion loan from Russia is also not enough to compensate for possible losses from a trade war with Kiev. Belarus’ Foreign Minister Makei emphasised the importance of Belarusian-Ukrainian economic relations: “Ukraine is our second most important trade partner in the former Soviet Union, after Russia. In previous years, the turnover with Ukraine was USD 8 billion, with trade surplus. "
Belarus’ representative in the EEC, Sergei Rumas said that “due to the lack of consensus [regarding import duties], Russia, according to the EEU regulations has the right to introduce these duties unilaterally”. If the Kremlin unilaterally introduces import duties on Ukraine, Belarus might gain benefits from the common customs space by re-exporting Ukrainian goods to Russia.
Meanwhile, Belarus has introduced restrictions on imports of some Ukrainian goods without coordinating these actions with Moscow. These measures comply with the current government policy aiming to reduce imports to Belarus. For instance, Belarus has introduced certification on beer and confectionery made in Ukraine, which prompted Ukrainian confectioners and brewers to suspend deliveries to Belarus.
Belarus will continue to stand up for an independent economic policy with regard to Ukraine – in particular, if her economic interests are at stake – but will mitigate her stance with rhetoric about allied support for Russia. Meanwhile, the Belarusian authorities might adopt restrictive measures against imports from Ukraine in order to carry out their import substitution policy.
During searches of social and "green" activists and anarchists, law enforcement has seized computers, mobile phones and publications. The authorities have also exerted additional pressure on supporters of unauthorized street protests and independent lawyers, who represented defendants in the White Legion case. The security services have stepped up the persecution of opponents before the street protests announced by the opposition. Apparently, the Belarusian authorities aspire that participants in street protests would reduce in number and that the low interest of the population to socio-political agenda before the local election campaign would retain.