Official Minsk does not wish to side with Kremlin over Ukrainian conflict

Category status:
April 22, 2016 18:46

The President of Russia, Vladimir Putin discussed the aggravation of the socio-political situation in Ukraine in his telephone conversations with President of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, and President of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev. 

President Lukashenko as well as the President of Kazakhstan Nazarbayev have so far not given in to pressure from the Kremlin as regards support for Russia’s aggression in Crimea. The Belarusian authorities are trying to keep public opinion in Belarus informed in  on the situation in Ukraine without compromising its territorial integrity. Official Minsk has undertaken several measures to strengthen national security.

The Kremlin, caught in international isolation due to the conflict in Ukraine, has stepped up pressure on its strategic allies in an attempt to win their support. First, on the initiative of President Putin, telephone conversations with the presidents of Belarus and Kazakhstan were held, their main topic was ‘the critical development of the situation in Ukraine’. Then, the head of Russia used the opportunity to personally convince the heads of the Belarusian and Kazakh states of the need for his actions with regard to Ukraine during the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council. It is noteworthy that the meeting of the heads of states had been moved to an earlier date and was conducted in the midst of the escalating tensions in Russian-Ukrainian relations. 

However, neither the president of Belarus nor  Kazakhstan have offered their support for the Kremlin’s actions in Ukraine. Besides, President Lukashenko is trying to avoid making official statements on the crisis in Russian-Ukrainian relations. At that, the Belarusian Foreign Ministry continues to insist in its statements on the importance of preserving Ukraine as a ‘stable, territorially integral, independent state’.

Moreover, the Belarusian authorities are carefully trying to inform public opinion while downgrading the divide among the citizens on how they perceive Ukrainian events. The Belarusian state media coverage of what is happening in Ukraine is relatively balanced and differs significantly from the Russian propaganda. For example, the Deputy Foreign Minister of Belarus,Mikhnevich outlined one of the key aspects of the official position on Ukraine during his meeting with students in Gomel: ‘there is a call not to apply  external pressure...  let the Ukrainian people sort it out themselves’. It is worth noting that the meeting of  the Belarusian Ministry of Foreign Affairs representative  with young people was organised in the south-eastern region,  on the  of Belarus-Russia-Ukraine border with traditionally strong pro-Russian sentiments.

One can observe consolidation of the standpoints of the Belarusian authorities and the opposition with respect to actions of the Russian leadership in Crimea. Most opposition parties and movements assess Russia’s aggression against Ukraine in extremely negative terms. At the same time, as usual, the Belarusian authorities are nervously reacting to any manifestation of solidarity of opposition activists with the Ukrainian people.

Official Minsk reacted to the escalating crisis in Crimea also by bolstering  measures to ensure national security  by making additional amendments to the draft law ‘On defence emergency’. It is noteworthy that he authors of the document consider possible threats on the part of the US and EU as well as Russia, i.e. their strategic ally. The member of the National Security Committee of the Belarusian parliament, Valevach, commented on the relationship between the draft law and events in Ukraine: ‘As soon as the conflict started, geopolitical interests in Russia, the US, the European Union immediately appeared. The state should always be ready to repel the external threats’.

Thus, President Lukashenko will not yield to the Kremlin’s pressure and will refrain from supporting the Russian aggression against Ukraine. Official Minsk will seek to limit the Russian presence in the country in all areas. Regardless of further developments in Crimea, the Belarusian leadership will strengthen measures to ensure national security. 

Similar articles

President ensures continuity of state administration with young middle-level personnel
October 02, 2017 12:08
Image: BRSM.BY

President Lukashenka continues to rotate staff and rejuvenate heads of departments and universities following new appointments in regional administrations. Apparently, new Information Minister Karliukevich could somewhat relax the state policy towards the independent media and introduce technological solutions for retaining control over Belarus’ information space. New rectors could strengthen the trend for soft Belarusization in the regions and tighten the disciplinary and ideological control over the student movement in the capital.

President Lukashenka has appointed new ministers of culture and information, the new rector of the Belarusian State University and heads of three universities, assistants in the Minsk and Vitebsk regions.

The new Information Minister Karliukevich is likely to avoid controversial initiatives similar to those former Minister Ananich was famous for, however, certainly within his capacities. Nevertheless, the appointment of Belarusian-speaking writer Karliukevich could be regarded as the state’s cautious attempt to relax environment in the media field and ensure the sovereignty of national media.

The Belarusian leadership has consolidated the trend for mild Belarusization by appointing a young historian and a ‘reasonable nationalist’, Duk as the rector at the Kuleshov State University in Mogilev. Meanwhile, while choosing the head of the Belarusian State University, the president apparently had in mind the strengthening of the ideological loyalty among the teaching staff and students at the main university in order to keep the youth movement at bay. Previously, Korol was the rector of the Kupala State University in Grodno, where he held purges among the disloyal teaching staff.

The trend for the renewal of mid-ranking executives and their rejuvenation has confirmed. The age of the Culture Minister and three new rectors varies from 39 to 44 years old.