Putin and Lukashenko: there will be no emergency aid

Category status:
April 22, 2016 18:03

At the meeting in Sochi on September 15th Putin and Lukashenko discussed Belarusian-Russian relations. In the short term no decisive breakthroughs, destructive conflicts, or ‘first aid’ financial assistance from Russia should be anticipated.

Belarusian media reported that the meeting in Sochi was initiated by Russia, but on September 11th, President Lukashenko phoned Putin to congratulate him on the success of the APEC Summit (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation), where the Russian President represented interests of Belarus and Kazakhstan as part of the Customs Union.

In Russo-Belarusian relations, the most important issues for Russia include: the introduction of utilization duty on motor cars by Belarus simultaneously with Russia, and in general – synchronization of trade policies and Belarus’ political support of Russian integration initiatives. For Belarus, the most important issues are to obtain the next tranche from the EurAsEC Anti-Crisis Fund, compensation measures for Russia’s WTO accession, new loans and / or sale of state enterprises. 

On the Russian issues, “common issues” were discussed in a spirit of constructive and peaceful cooperation, but no concrete decisions were taken. On the issue of introduction of utilization duty on motor cars by Belarus, Belarus received the opportunity to sell its consent to such a measure, and to delay introducing the duty until a convenient date. Russia would like Belarus to introduce this duty at minimum for agricultural vehicles, as this would simplify the movement of imported motor vehicles within the Customs Union borders, reducing Russia’s control costs. Basically, Russia could motivate Belarus to take this step, if Russia in exchange could ensure lower costs for Belarusian agricultural producers after the utilization duty has been introduced by Russia.

Regarding Belarusian issues, there was no chance that the parties could find easy solutions. The only exception was a virtual guarantee that Belarus will receive the fourth tranche from the EurAsEC ACF with the only disagreement about the allocation terms. Russia is not set up to pay compensation to Belarus because of its WTO accession. Putin was hardly impressed by problems voiced by Lukashenko concerning migration control at the Customs Union border. It would be premature for Russia to consider new loans for Belarus: such option exists but not in 2012.

In order to close the funding gap, Belarus would either have to sell a large enterprise or focus on negotiations with the IMF. Since it is unlikely that Belarus will reach an agreement with the IMF in 2012, Belarus will have to find a buyer for some of the largest state-owned assets by the end of the year.

Similar articles

Minsk attempts to make up for image losses from military exercises by opening to Western values
October 02, 2017 11:49
Image: Catholic.by

The Belarusian authorities regard the Catholic conference as yet another international event to promote Minsk as a global negotiating platform. Minsk’s proposal to organise a meeting between the Roman-Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church is rather an image-making undertaking than a serious intention. However, the authorities could somewhat extend the opportunities for the Roman-Catholic Church in Belarus due to developing contacts with the Catholic world.

Minsk is attempting to lay out a mosaic from various international religious, political and sportive events to shape a positive image of Belarus for promoting the Helsinki 2.0 idea.

Belarus’ invitation to the head of the Holy See for a meeting with the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church should be regarded as a continuation of her foreign policy efforts in shaping Minsk’s peacekeeping image and enhancing Belarus’ international weight. The Belarusian authorities are aware that their initiative is unlikely to find supporters among the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow. In Russia, isolationist sentiments prevail.

In addition, for domestic audiences, the authorities make up for the lack of tangible economic growth with demonstrations of growth in Minsk’s authority at international level through providing a platform for religious, sportive and other dialogues.