header -->

EU sanctions will be challenged in court

Category status:
April 22, 2016 17:50

The authorities aim to use the vulnerability of the EU “black list” i.e. its bias and lack of transparency of its compilation. They will use the suits filed by Peftiev to accuse the EU Council of injustice and politicized attitude and exploit these allegations for propaganda purposes in the future.

On 18 October it has been made public that on 12 August a Belarusian businessman Vladimir Peftiev filed four suits against the Council of the European Union concerning the economic sanctions introduced against him. A Lithuanian law firm LAWIN provides legal services to the businessman.

Comment

The authorities aim to use the vulnerability of the EU “black list” i.e. its bias and lack of transparency of its compilation. They will use the suits filed by Peftiev to accuse the EU Council of injustice and politicized attitude and exploit these allegations for propaganda purposes in the future.

By challenging the EU Council decision, Minsk predictably takes a position of the wrongly accused and starts a counter-attack. Thereby the Belarusian authorities hope to demonstrate that the decision to impose sanctions was opportunistic, lobbied by individual politicians (mainly Polish and German). Along with Peftiev a similar lawsuit has been filed by a former Deputy Editor of the largest state owned newspaper “SB Belarus Segodnia” Anna Shadrina, who also found herself on the EU visa “black list”.

The most likely result of the trial would be a sort of compromise: Mr. Peftiev would withdraw his claims in exchange for compliance by the EU with his business interests.

Belarusian side is convinced that the trial of the case of Peftiev will put the defendant in a difficult position, since the latter will have to provide with a legal justification for imposing the economic sanctions, particularly bearing in mind their explicitly political nature. Moreover, Belarus hopes that in the course of the trial Brussels will be obliged to disclose the principle of compilation of the “black list” and question its objectivity.

 In 2010 Forbes Magazine estimated Peftiev’s fortune at roughly $1 billion.

Belarus believes the names of authors of the “black lists” will be disclosed during the trial and this information will be used as a lever to pressure the EU. On the other hand, the trial could result in the disclosure of the financial schemes of the family of President Lukashenko, i.e. the main reason of the introduced economic sanctions. However such outcome is highly unlikely, provided that making this information public could do a lot of damage to both Minsk and its business partners abroad. The most likely result of the trial would be a sort of compromise: Mr. Peftiev would withdraw his claims in exchange for compliance by the EU with his business interests.

For reference

On 20 June the EU Council for the first time imposed the economic sanctions against Belarusian business by freezing the European assets of 3 companies of Mr. Peftiev, based on the suspicion of their involvement in financial schemes of the family of Lukashenko. Mr. Peftiev is the wealthiest businessman in Belarus and his business interests are wide-spread from arms trade (a company “Beltechexport”) to lottery business (“Sportpari”) and telecommunications (Internet service provider “Business Network”). In 2010 Forbes Magazine estimated Peftiev’s fortune at roughly $1 billion.

 

Similar articles

Minsk attempts to make up for image losses from military exercises by opening to Western values
October 02, 2017 11:49
Image: Catholic.by

The Belarusian authorities regard the Catholic conference as yet another international event to promote Minsk as a global negotiating platform. Minsk’s proposal to organise a meeting between the Roman-Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church is rather an image-making undertaking than a serious intention. However, the authorities could somewhat extend the opportunities for the Roman-Catholic Church in Belarus due to developing contacts with the Catholic world.

Minsk is attempting to lay out a mosaic from various international religious, political and sportive events to shape a positive image of Belarus for promoting the Helsinki 2.0 idea.

Belarus’ invitation to the head of the Holy See for a meeting with the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church should be regarded as a continuation of her foreign policy efforts in shaping Minsk’s peacekeeping image and enhancing Belarus’ international weight. The Belarusian authorities are aware that their initiative is unlikely to find supporters among the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow. In Russia, isolationist sentiments prevail.

In addition, for domestic audiences, the authorities make up for the lack of tangible economic growth with demonstrations of growth in Minsk’s authority at international level through providing a platform for religious, sportive and other dialogues.

Recent trends