Error message

Russian rouble devaluation is now main challenge for Belarusian economy

April 22, 2016 19:01

The sharp Russian rouble devaluation, given the scale of the Russian-Belarusian economic relations is a direct threat to the Belarusian economy. In developing protective and compensatory measures, the Belarusian government apparently intends to use the traditional administrative means. In particular, despite the agreements on free movement of goods within the Customs Union, Belarus may restrict imports of Russian goods to the Belarusian market in order to protect domestic producers.

On November 15th, the RUR/USD exchange rate was RUR 47.39 per USD 1. This means, that since early 2014, the Russian currency depreciated by 45% against US Dollar. The main reasons include, progressive drop in oil prices and destabilsing effect from the sanctions imposed by Western countries over the situation in Ukraine. In addition, Russian rouble is under significant pressure due to the need to repay significant external corporate liabilities and because foreign currency earnings have reduced significantly due to falling oil prices and reduced sales of natural gas on foreign markets. Some large Russian companies have limited access to loans on the debt markets in the EU and the US, as well as to technology, which allows increasing production in the long-term. In the view of the bulk of negative external factors, the Russian rouble will be subject to further pressure from legal entities and individuals.

The Belarusian economy is largely dependent on the processes taking place in the Russian economy. Belarus’ Prime Minister Mikhail Myasnikovich said, that the Russian rouble devaluation was one of the main reasons why domestic goods had lost their competitiveness. For example, in August-October 2014, losses from the Russian rouble devaluation in food industry alone exceeded USD 160 million. Export of engineering products are reducing, so as they are mostly supplied to the Russian market. Fears for the Belarusian rouble amid Russian rouble devaluation have led to an increase in devaluation expectations in Belarus, which resulted in citizens becoming net buyers of foreign currency and rouble deposits growing at a slower pace in the banking system.

In these circumstances, the most reasonable thing would be Belarusian rouble devaluation by circa 20%-25% in order to restore the competitiveness of domestic products, both on the domestic and on the Russian market. However, this solution might cause undesirable social phenomena ahead of the elections in 2015. Therefore, the National Bank – for the sake of "stability" – maintains the gradual depreciation of the national currency policy. In order to help domestic producers on the domestic market, the government may apply administrative restrictions on imports, including ‘non-officially’ on Russian products. On November 11th, President Lukashenko said, “sit down and think about how you are going to protect our own producers. References to that we liabilities in the Customs Union, the Eurasian Union shall not be accepted. Own producers should be protected”.

In order to reduce the production costs, wage growth may be limited at industrial plants and managers’ functions may increase in order to have the room for layoffs.

The government is using mainly administrative means to neutralise the negative impact of the Russian rouble devaluation on the economic processes in Belarus. In the mid-term, such measures may be ineffective, because they might inflict new negative effects, in both, economic and social spheres.

Similar articles

Minsk attempts to make up for image losses from military exercises by opening to Western values
October 02, 2017 11:49
Image: Catholic.by

The Belarusian authorities regard the Catholic conference as yet another international event to promote Minsk as a global negotiating platform. Minsk’s proposal to organise a meeting between the Roman-Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church is rather an image-making undertaking than a serious intention. However, the authorities could somewhat extend the opportunities for the Roman-Catholic Church in Belarus due to developing contacts with the Catholic world.

Minsk is attempting to lay out a mosaic from various international religious, political and sportive events to shape a positive image of Belarus for promoting the Helsinki 2.0 idea.

Belarus’ invitation to the head of the Holy See for a meeting with the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church should be regarded as a continuation of her foreign policy efforts in shaping Minsk’s peacekeeping image and enhancing Belarus’ international weight. The Belarusian authorities are aware that their initiative is unlikely to find supporters among the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow. In Russia, isolationist sentiments prevail.

In addition, for domestic audiences, the authorities make up for the lack of tangible economic growth with demonstrations of growth in Minsk’s authority at international level through providing a platform for religious, sportive and other dialogues.