National Bank of Belarus cancels the supplementary trading session on the Stock Exchange

Category status:
April 22, 2016 17:53

On 26 April the National Bank reported, that there was no need to introduce an additional session at the Belarusian Currency and Stock Exchange.

The National Bank explained, “Opening of an alternative with respect to the main trading session requires considerable preparatory work of a technical nature, as well as creation of favourable conditions for sustainable and efficient operation of the supplementary session.” 

Comment

Therefore we were proven right with our predictions. The NBoB postponed the alternative session, because 1) it could not perform as a full scale player during the trading session, and 2) chances were high that the rate would exceed the one “recommended” by the government: Br 4,500 per US Dollar, therefore de facto devaluating ruble by 50% (on Thursday, 28 April the NBoB withdrew its oral “recommendation”), and 3) commercial banks and enterprises have efficient legal schemes to circumvent various “recommendations” and work based on the currency rate determined by the demand and supply, bypassing inter-bank market. 

Randomness and inconsistency of the decision-making at the highest level of the country speaks in favour of the lack or failure to have a clear vision of how and what to do and their inability / fear to explain what needs to be done to the president. 

Indeed, in the first decade of May the banks will make single transactions of purchase and sale of foreign currency between their customers at the market rate of Br 4500-6000 per US Dollar. It is already clear that the long-awaited $ 1 billion of the Russian stabilization loan will be spent on critically depleted reserves of the BNoB as soon as it is received, and that the currency will not reach the exchange offices of commercial banks. On the one hand, it meets the strategic interests of the government for the moment being (“cutting” the consumption of the imported goods and restricting the currency export from the country), on the other, it jeopardizes the economy and provokes continuously rising discontent of the population. 

A single currency exchange rate today means an uncontrolled devaluation, not feasible for political reasons. Accordingly, the authorities will try to keep the situation as it is by any means and will try to bring down the devaluation expectations after receiving loans and by selling assets. A single currency exchange rate today means an uncontrolled devaluation, not feasible for political reasons. Accordingly, the authorities will try to keep the situation as it is by any means and will try to bring down the devaluation expectations after receiving loans and by selling assets. 

The recent initiative of the NBoB to meet the demand of the so-called currency requisitions of the third queue, i.e. to pay off foreign debts, confirms this trend. Very few of those in the need were able to purchase the currency for these purposes, however, before the long weekend those who need to pay the loans were reassured and would likely wait for another week, without pumping up the devaluation expectations. As a result, the exchange rate on the interbank market fell to Br 4800 as the upper margin (it was as high as Br 5300 on 28 April). The cash market has also adjusted itself downwards. 

The National Bank has supported the tendency by expressing hope that the narrowing range of the currency rate fluctuations will become a sustainable trend. 

However this policy is a risky business, a huge number of disaffected market players, facing the inability to repay the loans at the official rate, could inflate it to the new heights, increasing the gap between the official and unofficial exchange rate by 100% by the end of next week.

Similar articles

Minsk attempts to make up for image losses from military exercises by opening to Western values
October 02, 2017 11:49
Image: Catholic.by

The Belarusian authorities regard the Catholic conference as yet another international event to promote Minsk as a global negotiating platform. Minsk’s proposal to organise a meeting between the Roman-Catholic Church and the Russian Orthodox Church is rather an image-making undertaking than a serious intention. However, the authorities could somewhat extend the opportunities for the Roman-Catholic Church in Belarus due to developing contacts with the Catholic world.

Minsk is attempting to lay out a mosaic from various international religious, political and sportive events to shape a positive image of Belarus for promoting the Helsinki 2.0 idea.

Belarus’ invitation to the head of the Holy See for a meeting with the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church should be regarded as a continuation of her foreign policy efforts in shaping Minsk’s peacekeeping image and enhancing Belarus’ international weight. The Belarusian authorities are aware that their initiative is unlikely to find supporters among the leadership of the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow. In Russia, isolationist sentiments prevail.

In addition, for domestic audiences, the authorities make up for the lack of tangible economic growth with demonstrations of growth in Minsk’s authority at international level through providing a platform for religious, sportive and other dialogues.

Recent trends