All trends
Democratic forces pursue an anti-mobilization agenda as the Cabinet consolidates political exiles around an ultimatum position
Supporters of violent regime change consolidate support as Tsikhanouskaya promotes the civil society agenda at the UN
Democrats promote isolation of the regime; civil society groups develop network services
Democratic forces strengthen their positions at the international level, making independence a priority
The Joint Cabinet revises the agenda of democratic forces, reducing support for pro-Ukrainian initiatives
Civil society organisations lose influence in Europe, though positive expectations from the Joint Transition Cabinet remain
Tensions within democratic forces subside as civil society develops services for supporters of change
Tsikhanouskaya seeks alignment with partners as rhetoric against the regime intensifies
Leadership disputes within democratic forces continue to grow as the influence of political organisations on the domestic agenda declines
Criticism of Tsikhanouskaya’s office continues; activists are demotivated due to prolonged confrontation
Leadership struggles amongst democratic forces as the emphasis on forceful regime change increases
Radicalization of the positions of supporters of change spurs reformatting in democratic forces
Democrats revise their strategy as the mood of civil society polarises in response to repression
International influence wavers, and the protest movement polarises
Civil society develops infrastructure to help emigrants; democratic forces focus on the European choice
Democratic forces gradually consolidate a pro-EU position; civil society focuses on counter-propaganda and advocating for political prisoners
Civil society consolidates the pro-European audience as activists block state propaganda on the Internet
Democrats maintain regime isolation. Centre-rightists renew cooperation with EU political bloc
Tensions are growing in democratic forces; initiatives are testing the scope of activities in Belarus
Democrats intensify sanctions rhetoric as Tsepkala unites critics of Tsikhanouskaya
Democratic forces shape the international agenda as partisan protests against the regime continue
Independent media and state propaganda reach audience parity. Ultimatum positions remain popular
Democrats strengthen their position internationally; tensions in civil society continue to rise
An ultimatum strategy prevails for civil society and democratic forces
Democratic organisations strengthen relations with post-Soviet EU countries; civil society focuses on the anti-war agenda
Civil society seeks simplification of residency procedures for Belarusians in Europe. Democratic forces form an anti-war agenda
Democrats continue to delegitimise the Lukashenka regime on the international stage as the anti-war movement steers the agenda
Consolidation of exiles, the anti-war movement in Belarus and diasporas on Freedom Day
Democrats attempt to dissociate Belarus from the ruling regime; radical strategies prevail
Civil society rallies around the anti-war agenda as the influence of independent media expands
The rhetoric of Democratic Forces is getting harsher as the audience for independent media increases
Anti-war mobilisation leads to rapprochement of the positions of democratic organisations
Civil society and democratic forces concentrate on the international agenda; political parties develop online communication channels
Civil society develops online services, democratic forces promote the sanctions agenda
With conflicting approaches to the referendum, the politicisation of supporters of change subsides
Democratic forces agree to participate in the constitutional referendum
Pressure on Yara delivers results; diasporas support a unified position on the referendum
Society and political parties
Democratic forces pursue an anti-mobilization agenda as the Cabinet consolidates political exiles around an ultimatum position 
September 26 – October 2
Supporters of violent regime change consolidate support as Tsikhanouskaya promotes the civil society agenda at the UN 
September 19 – September 25
Democrats promote isolation of the regime; civil society groups develop network services
September 12 – September 18
Democratic forces strengthen their positions at the international level, making independence a priority
September 5 – September 11
The Joint Cabinet revises the agenda of democratic forces, reducing support for pro-Ukrainian initiatives 
August 29 – September 4
Civil society organisations lose influence in Europe, though positive expectations from the Joint Transition Cabinet remain
August 22 – August 28
Tensions within democratic forces subside as civil society develops services for supporters of change
August 15 – August 21
Tsikhanouskaya seeks alignment with partners as rhetoric against the regime intensifies
August 8 – August 14
Leadership disputes within democratic forces continue to grow as the influence of political organisations on the domestic agenda declines
August 1 – August 7
Criticism of Tsikhanouskaya’s office continues; activists are demotivated due to prolonged confrontation
July 25 – July 31
Leadership struggles amongst democratic forces as the emphasis on forceful regime change increases
July 18 – July 24
Radicalization of the positions of supporters of change spurs reformatting in democratic forces
July 11 – July 17
Democrats revise their strategy as the mood of civil society polarises in response to repression
July 4 – July 10
International influence wavers, and the protest movement polarises
June 27 – July 3
Civil society develops infrastructure to help emigrants; democratic forces focus on the European choice
June 20 – June 26
Democratic forces gradually consolidate a pro-EU position; civil society focuses on counter-propaganda and advocating for political prisoners
June 13 – June 19
Civil society consolidates the pro-European audience as activists block state propaganda on the Internet
June 6 – June 12
Democrats maintain regime isolation. Centre-rightists renew cooperation with EU political bloc
May 30 – June 5
Tensions are growing in democratic forces; initiatives are testing the scope of activities in Belarus
May 23 – May 29
Democrats intensify sanctions rhetoric as Tsepkala unites critics of Tsikhanouskaya
May 16 – May 22
Democratic forces shape the international agenda as partisan protests against the regime continue
May 9 – May 15
Independent media and state propaganda reach audience parity. Ultimatum positions remain popular
May 2 – May 8
Democrats strengthen their position internationally; tensions in civil society continue to rise
April 25 – May 1
An ultimatum strategy prevails for civil society and democratic forces
April 18 – April 24
Democratic organisations strengthen relations with post-Soviet EU countries; civil society focuses on the anti-war agenda
April 11 – April 17
Civil society seeks simplification of residency procedures for Belarusians in Europe. Democratic forces form an anti-war agenda
April 4 – April 10
Democrats continue to delegitimise the Lukashenka regime on the international stage as the anti-war movement steers the agenda
March 28 – April 3
Consolidation of exiles, the anti-war movement in Belarus and diasporas on Freedom Day
March 21 – March 27
Democrats attempt to dissociate Belarus from the ruling regime; radical strategies prevail
March 14 – March 20
Civil society rallies around the anti-war agenda as the influence of independent media expands
March 7 – March 13
The rhetoric of Democratic Forces is getting harsher as the audience for independent media increases
February 28 – March 6
Anti-war mobilisation leads to rapprochement of the positions of democratic organisations
February 21 – February 27
Civil society and democratic forces concentrate on the international agenda; political parties develop online communication channels
February 14 – February 20
Civil society develops online services, democratic forces promote the sanctions agenda
February 7 – February 13
With conflicting approaches to the referendum, the politicisation of supporters of change subsides
January 31 – February 6
Democratic forces agree to participate in the constitutional referendum
January 17 – January 23
Pressure on Yara delivers results; diasporas support a unified position on the referendum
January 10 – January 16